Skip to content

Matrimonial property settlement – is it really finalised?

Matrimonial Property Settlement - Is It Really Finalised?

After a couple who separated reached an oral agreement about property settlement, the husband later lost his job and received a termination payment of more than $230,000 in addition to which his superannuation fund increased by around $480,000.

When the wife sought to start property settlement proceedings in Court six years out of time, the question was whether she was entitled to any of these additional amounts.

 

divorce settlements

Matrimonial Property Disputes

In matrimonial property disputes there is a time limit within which to start proceedings.  There must be an Application to the Court for property settlement filed in the appropriate Court within one year of a divorce becoming absolute for married couples (ie when the Court issues a Certificate of Divorce), or for de facto couples within two years of separation.

But does that mean that if it’s been longer than this time then there’s nothing you can do -or that you can be confident your ex-partner won’t be able to take any action?

If the time limit has expired an application can be made to the Court for ‘leave to proceed’, but such an application will only be granted in certain circumstances.  The Court will consider whether the person making the application has established that on the face of things they have a reasonable case for property settlement, that denial of the claim would cause them hardship and that there is an adequate explanation for the delay.  Then if these things are proved, the Court must also look at whether the other party would suffer any prejudice if the application is granted.

Recent Case

Recently the Family Court allowed a woman to start her proceedings for property settlement six years past the time limit.  The couple were divorced on 16 January 2009 and so any property settlement proceedings had to be started by 16 January 2010, however the wife filed her application on 17 October 2016.

The parties had been married for ten years and there were three children, the youngest of whom was seventeen.  The woman had been the primary carer for the children since separation and had done so without the benefit of child support from the husband, although he paid the rates and insurance on the house in which the wife and children were living.  The net asset pool was around $1.5 million and around 32% was already owned by the woman.  She applied for between 57% and 61% of the asset pool.

Shortly after separation the parties had reached an oral property settlement agreement.  But during the time that they were separated, her ex-partner’s superannuation had increased by around $480,000.  In 2009 the husband’s employment was terminated and he received a redundancy payment of more than $230,000.

Should those extra amounts be included in the asset pool so that the wife would be entitled to some of them?

The Court Findings

The Court concluded that there was a basis for finding that the significant increase in the value of the husband’s superannuation was due to growth in the fund and that as most of the contributions to the fund occurred prior to separation the wife should be taken to have made non-financial contributions to it.  The Court held that as the husband was with the same employer throughout the relationship and until his termination, the wife had made considerable indirect contributions to his redundancy entitlements

In assessing the woman’s application to start proceedings outside of the time limit, the Court said that it had to consider whether there was a real probability that she would receive a property division somewhere between what she presently held, and the outcome that she was seeking.

At the end of the day, the Court can make whatever orders that it considers to be appropriate, provided that they are fair.

Financial Contributions

During the course of the relationship the husband had made a considerably greater financial contribution having brought in property that he already owned along with an inheritance that he received during the time that they were together.  On the other hand, the wife had made a greater non-financial contribution to that property and to the welfare of the family.

The other question that had to be considered was whether the wife would suffer hardship if her application to start proceedings out of time was refused.  The Court noted that she owed debts to her parents and a friend because she had borrowed money to pay the children’s school fees, and that her ability to rehouse herself would improve if the application was granted.

What was the wife’s reasons for not commencing proceedings sooner?

Verbal Agreement

She said that her understanding of their verbal agreement was that she was to keep the property in which she was living and her car, and that the husband would retain his superannuation and everything else including another property.  According to the husband, the wife and the children were to be permitted to live in the house until the youngest child turned sixteen, and then it was to be sold and the proceeds divided equally.  Apparently this all came to light when the husband sent the wife a text message pressing for the sale of the house.

It was this dispute as to the terms of the agreement that caused the Court to consider her explanation for the delay to be adequate.  The Court said that the point is not whether or not there was an agreement in place, or the terms of that agreement, but whether the wife reasonably believed that she had such an agreement with her husband so that it was not necessary for her to approach the Court for an order for property settlement.

She though that she was protected by the agreement, but when the husband challenged her understanding of what they had agreed, she quickly sought leave to start proceedings out of time.

While on this occasion the wife was successful in obtaining an extension of time to start proceedings this case shows the dangers of making informal agreements regarding matrimonial property settlement.  Family law property settlement can be done as quickly or as soon as you want after separation.  If you are negotiating with your former spouse and an agreement hasn’t been reached, be aware that you need to institute proceedings within the applicable time limit or you might lose your chance to pursue your case if those negotiations break down.

When you need advice about matrimonial property settlement, why not meet with a family law specialist at Websters Lawyers for a free initial consultation.  Find out where you stand, what action you can take and what the legal fees are likely to be.  Send through an online enquiry here or give us a call on 8231 1363.

Edmunds & Edmunds [2018] FamCAFC 121

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FamCAFC/2018/121.html

FREE FIRST INTERVIEW

NO WIN NO FEE

LOCAL LAWYERS FOR LOCAL NEEDS

GET THE RIGHT LAWYER FIRST

call now

Testimonials

Having such a short time frame I was very impressed with the outcome made by [my solicitor]. Excellent and timely manner

Sebastian

Kurralta Park

Very professional mannerism and overall great outcome was delivered by Websters Lawyers.

Nicholas

West Ryde NSW

Helpful, explained fully, patient, excellent service.

Kerry

Ridgehaven

Patient and helpful in explaining the process.

Brian

Ridgehaven

Call Websters Lawyers for a most professional and friendly service. All understanding with [my solicitors] and the reception staff. Thank you so much.

Christine

Magill

Making my will was effortless on my part, with everything explained clearly. Well done to all.

Christina

Highbury

Great service, professional, explains things clearly, definitely recommend Websters Lawyers.

Garth

Upper Hermitage

Patient, professional, good communication about procedures and probable outcomes.

Jeffrey

Brompton

Thank you for all your work over the course of the case. You [both] were always very approachable and I appreciated your understanding and professionalism in all areas.

Alexis

Christie Downs

All in all my experience was great. Thank you for your time and expertise.

Christina

Seacombe Gardens

My matter was dealt with efficiently and was explained in an understandable language. A pleasant experience.

Mary

Ridgehaven

Practical and very helpful. Reasons and explanations given where needed

John

Ridgehaven

I stumbled across Websters in the Yellow Pages and I rang, explained my situation and immediately they took my case on. Greatly appreciate their services.

Diane 

Ridgehaven

The service from Websters Lawyers was outstanding. [My solicitor] was caring, had patience and was very professional. Wonderful personality.

Julie

Yorketown

[My solicitor] made everything so simple to understand. [The receptionist] was wicked too, would recommend them anytime. Level of entire service was outstanding.

Craig

Golden Grove

 

I had dealings with Websters over 20 years ago. They were my first choice when I recently needed legal advice. Both legal and office staff were professional, courteous and accessible at all times. Everything was explained up front in a clear and concise manner. I would not hesitate to recommend their services.

Rod

Dernancourt

It has truly been a pleasure communicating with you throughout the process. I really appreciate your patient and speedy replies to my questions and requests. You were always able to provide an easily understood response and this helped me deal with the process. Your friendly and positive manner encouraged me to seek your advice.

Kathleen

Battery Hill QLD

[My lawyer's] service was prompt and efficient with all questions explained clearly with all our requests carried out within the laws. Overall service was very satisfactory.

John

Wynn Vale

[My lawyer] was excellent. 

Gordon

Glengowrie

Excellent service. Professional. Clear advice and instructions. Prompt actions. Overall 10/10!

Phillip

Ingle Farm

Overall, I was happy with my outcome and my lawyer, would definitely recommend [my lawyer].

Janet

Adelaide

[My solicitor] was excellent at helping us through preparing our wills which were particularly challenging as they involved assets in multiple countries. She was professional and knowledgeable and spent time tailoring the wills to our needs.

Jonathan

Greenwith

[My solicitor] was very helpful, respectful and polite. She made sure I understood the process and documentation of our wills.

Rachel

Greenwith

Professional. Smooth Transaction. 

Luke

Largs North

I found the whole experience from Receptionist to Solicitor excellent. They completely put us at our ease.

Ethel

Smithfield

This was a new experience for us and didn’t have a clue what to do. [Our solicitor] on our first visit put us at ease, explained what will happen, pointed out there was a strong case. [Our solicitor] was genuine in her approach, kept us well informed, explained actions several times with patience and understanding. Overall very happy with the service we received.

Stephen

Elizabeth Vale

[My lawyer] was very reassuring in her approach to my case. I felt that every possibility in terms of evidence to provide and possible outcomes were explained to me, The result of the case was the best possible outcome I could have expected.

David, Belair

 

With no previous dealing with the criminal justice system, [our solicitor] gave us excellent advice and guided us through a nightmare to achieve a just and correct outcome. [Our lawyer] was both forthright and compassionate in her handling of our case.

Malcolm, Belair

[My lawyer] explained all the legal terms in language I could understand – she was very easy to talk to.

Cameron, Munno Para

I felt confident knowing my matter was in good hands. Very professional!

Shravan, Christie Downs

Initial phone call was fantastic and the role of an executor was fully explained.

Penny, Henley Beach

The service I received was efficient and promptly finalised. The solicitor clearly explained the details and I was happy with how easy it was.

Dale, Fairview Park

[My lawyer] was exactly the lawyer I needed in a serious matter. The outcome was as predicted which was a fantastic result. I received prompt professional and personal service at all times. Capable and supportive in a very stressful period.

Jason, Munno Para West

I had any of my concerns answered to my satisfaction and understanding.

Valda, Ingle Farm

[My lawyer] is an excellent professional lawyer who assisted in achieving a great positive outcome/result. I sincerely thank you and your great staff for your assistance and guidance throughout my claim. Would highly recommend [my lawyer], staff and Websters Lawyers. Kept fully informed and guided, professionally throughout the matter.

Rena, Northgate

Our work was dealt with very efficiently and speedily. Our lawyer was very professional, at the same time as being approachable. Communication was great.

Christina, Highbury

My experience with Websters Lawyers was far beyond what I expected. From the moment I spoke to [my lawyer] she made me feel very comfortable and eased my stress. In my case I had a court appearance the day before we were scheduled to fly to Spain, Considering my first appointment with her was only 2 weeks before the court hearing, she was able to obtain the police statement and thoroughly work on my case within that limited time frame. She was very knowledgeable, understanding and confident which greatly relieved so much pressure from me and my family. At court, she explained everything thoroughly and advised me of all the possible outcomes. Price, service and result, very highly recommended. Thank you Websters Lawyers.

Rafael, Davoren Park

I have high expectations and they were met. Websters service was swift, courteous, professional and met the agreed budget. I will recommend Websters to my family, friends and colleagues. Thank you.

Peter, Forestville

I would recommend Websters Lawyers, especially for [my lawyer's] dedication and exemplary attitude and advice. She is the epitome of a good lawyer. The service was impeccable.

Pamela, West Lakes

[My lawyer] was very professional and I was made comfortable to understand.

Gregory, Penfield

I was very pleased with the end result and how well [my lawyer] conducted herself.

Sonya, Glanville

Very professional.

Jesse, Morphett Vale

[My lawyer] has been very prompt , reliable and provided a high level of communication.

Peter, Parkside

My experience at Websters was very positive. The stress was taken from me and I could not be happier with the outcome. [My lawyer] at Websters was professional, personable, available and caring. Thank you for making the experience stress free.

Magda, Holden Hill

Found my lawyer upfront and reliable – I would highly recommend Websters Lawyers.

Lee, Evanston Park

 

Top bunch of solicitors and admin staff. Very friendly and to the point service.

Bradley, Hallett Cove

Websters Lawyers were very professional in their service, I would be happy to recommend them.

Carole, Tea Tree Gully

We would not hesitate in recommending Websters for any legal matter. They are professional and courteous at all times and call back when they say they will.

David and Dianne, Lockleys

 

I fully recommend Websters Lawyers. This was the 3rd time myself & my family have used Websters Lawyers. In these stressful times we have found them to answer and guide us through the process needed to accomplish the legal requirements in a timely and courteous manner.

Dianne, Lynton

Solid, to the point, no hustle. Highly recommend.

George, Windsor Gardens

Contact Us

Adelaide Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8231 1363
F: ( 08 ) 8231 5529

Ridgehaven Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8395 8000
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

Smithfield Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8487 0150
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

© Copyright WebstersLawyers.com 2017 All Rights Reserved
Website By A to Z Marketing