'Strange Behaviour Not Enough For An Unlawful Police Search

Serious criminal charges against a man who was sitting in a car in which police found drugs, $18,600 cash, a knuckle duster and other items have been dismissed after the Court found that the police search of the car was unlawful.  The police officer who searched the car couldn’t remember what circumstances gave him the power to search, and the Court found it troubling that he gave evidence about the reasons for his search that he made no note of at the time.


unlawfully searching a car

Police Received Tip Off

The police had apparently received a ‘tip-off’ that there was illicit drug activity at an address in Ridleyton.  They were parked down the street one evening keeping the house under observation when they saw someone who ‘looked like a man’ coming from the house and walk to a car that was parked across the street.  

After some minutes the police drove past the car to get a look at who was inside. One of the police officers saw the occupant of the car ‘duck his head’ as they approached.  After parking to wait for the car to come out of the street, the police drove back and parked behind the car which was still across the road from the house.

According to one of the police officers, as he walked up to the car he noted that the engine was on and the driver was trying to crouch down into the foot well.  This seemed strange to the officer who concluded that the man was trying to avoid being seen. He knocked on the window of the car and the man put down the window.  When he was asked why he had been sitting out the front of the house for ten minutes the man was said to have replied that he knocked on the door but his friend wasn’t home.  The officer said, “I saw you walk from the front door after leaving the house,” to which the man replied, “No comment.”

Man Appeared Very Nervous

The police officer said that the man appeared very nervous and would not make eye contact.  The officer told the man that he was going to search the car ‘under the Controlled Substances Act.’  Interestingly, at the time the officer made no note of the man’s apparently ‘nervous demeanour’ nor did he make any mention of it in a statement he wrote later.  

At the time of the trial this officer was no longer serving in South Australia but had moved and was now a police officer in Queensland.  Although the trial was only 16 months after the incident, when he was asked what power he had to search the car the police officer said that he was unsure of any particular requirement involved as it had been a while since he had to use South Australian legislation.

Under the Controlled Substances Act a police officer can search a vehicle if they reasonably suspect that any substance or equipment that would afford evidence of an offence against that Act is in the vehicle.  There is also a power for police to search a vehicle under the Summary Offences Act when there is reasonable cause to suspect that there are stolen goods, or there is an object that it is an offence to possess, or there is evidence of the commission of an indictable (serious) offence.  

So the question was whether any suspicion that this police officer held was reasonable.  The Courts have said that ‘suspicion’ is more than ‘a mere idle wondering whether’ something exists or not but a positive feeling of actual apprehension or mistrust.  The requirement for a suspicion to be ‘reasonable’ means that there is an element of objectivity in the assessment. In other words the information available shouldn’t just produce a suspicion in the mind of the particular police officer, but should be able to create that suspicion in the mind of any reasonable person. Suspicion isn’t the same as ‘belief’, but is described as a ‘working hypothesis for which there is some supporting material’, not just mere curiosity or speculation.

The issue was that the information the police had received related to the house.  Neither the man nor his car were mentioned in the information given to the police about ‘illegal activity’ in the house.  The police officer said that as they were going to search the house, he believed that the car was ‘in relation to that address’ however he did not say that he actually suspected there might be drugs in the car.

In support of their case that the search was legal, the prosecution said that the actions and behaviour of the man along with the knowledge that the police had about the house amounted to a reasonable suspicion.  He was parked out the front of the house and had been sitting in the car for about ten minutes. He ducked down in the foot well of the car when the police went past and remained there until the officer knocked on the window, and he appeared nervous and kept looking down at his feet and at the centre console.

Fundamental Understanding Of Powers

On the other hand, the man made raised a number of issues including the point that as the police were in an unmarked car it wouldn’t have been apparent to him that they were police officers.  The fact that there was no record made by the police officer that the man appeared nervous raised the possibility that the officer had ‘made that up’ at the trial. The Judge said that the absence of any note being made by the police officer about the man appearing nervous was ‘troubling’ and that the officer did not demonstrate any fundamental understanding of the powers upon which he was acting.  The comment was made that the process of reasoning appeared to be that the car is near a drug house, so it must have drugs in it. It was clear that the police thought something strange was going on, but that wasn’t enough.

The Judge found that the search of the car was unlawful.

As we have written about a number of times, this does not automatically mean that the evidence obtained from the search can’t be used.  The Court has a discretion as to whether or not to allow police to rely on evidence that has been obtained unlawfully. This involves balancing the public need to bring to justice those who commit criminal offences with the public interest in protecting individuals from unlawful or unfair treatment.  The Court does not want to be seen as given approval or encouragement to unlawful conduct on the part of those who have the job of enforcing the law. In this case the charges were very serious and what the police found in their search of the car was important to their case. Without that evidence, the charges would fail.  Nevertheless, the Court decided that the evidence should not be allowed, noting that the exclusion of evidence obtained unlawfully is in the public interest so as to ensure that statements of disapproval regarding unlawful conduct by the police don’t appear hollow and insincere.

We continue to see cases of police relying on insufficient ground to justify an unlawful search.  For example: Can Police Search Me If I Don’t Say Hello?  In some circumstances, an unlawful search can even be the basis of legal action against the police.  If you have been charged with an offence or are concerned about the manner in which police have conducted a search, the sooner you act, the better. Websters Lawyers has a team of outstanding criminal lawyers who can assist you. Contact us today for a free first interview.





call now

*Conditions Apply


Having such a short time frame I was very impressed with the outcome made by [my solicitor]. Excellent and timely manner


Kurralta Park

Very professional mannerism and overall great outcome was delivered by Websters Lawyers.


West Ryde NSW

Helpful, explained fully, patient, excellent service.



Patient and helpful in explaining the process.



Call Websters Lawyers for a most professional and friendly service. All understanding with [my solicitors] and the reception staff. Thank you so much.



Making my will was effortless on my part, with everything explained clearly. Well done to all.



Great service, professional, explains things clearly, definitely recommend Websters Lawyers.


Upper Hermitage

Patient, professional, good communication about procedures and probable outcomes.



Thank you for all your work over the course of the case. You [both] were always very approachable and I appreciated your understanding and professionalism in all areas.


Christie Downs

All in all my experience was great. Thank you for your time and expertise.


Seacombe Gardens

My matter was dealt with efficiently and was explained in an understandable language. A pleasant experience.



Practical and very helpful. Reasons and explanations given where needed



I stumbled across Websters in the Yellow Pages and I rang, explained my situation and immediately they took my case on. Greatly appreciate their services.



The service from Websters Lawyers was outstanding. [My solicitor] was caring, had patience and was very professional. Wonderful personality.



[My solicitor] made everything so simple to understand. [The receptionist] was wicked too, would recommend them anytime. Level of entire service was outstanding.


Golden Grove


I had dealings with Websters over 20 years ago. They were my first choice when I recently needed legal advice. Both legal and office staff were professional, courteous and accessible at all times. Everything was explained up front in a clear and concise manner. I would not hesitate to recommend their services.



It has truly been a pleasure communicating with you throughout the process. I really appreciate your patient and speedy replies to my questions and requests. You were always able to provide an easily understood response and this helped me deal with the process. Your friendly and positive manner encouraged me to seek your advice.


Battery Hill QLD

[My lawyer's] service was prompt and efficient with all questions explained clearly with all our requests carried out within the laws. Overall service was very satisfactory.


Wynn Vale

[My lawyer] was excellent. 



Excellent service. Professional. Clear advice and instructions. Prompt actions. Overall 10/10!


Ingle Farm

Overall, I was happy with my outcome and my lawyer, would definitely recommend [my lawyer].



[My solicitor] was excellent at helping us through preparing our wills which were particularly challenging as they involved assets in multiple countries. She was professional and knowledgeable and spent time tailoring the wills to our needs.



[My solicitor] was very helpful, respectful and polite. She made sure I understood the process and documentation of our wills.



Professional. Smooth Transaction. 


Largs North

I found the whole experience from Receptionist to Solicitor excellent. They completely put us at our ease.



This was a new experience for us and didn’t have a clue what to do. [Our solicitor] on our first visit put us at ease, explained what will happen, pointed out there was a strong case. [Our solicitor] was genuine in her approach, kept us well informed, explained actions several times with patience and understanding. Overall very happy with the service we received.


Elizabeth Vale

[My lawyer] was very reassuring in her approach to my case. I felt that every possibility in terms of evidence to provide and possible outcomes were explained to me, The result of the case was the best possible outcome I could have expected.

David, Belair


With no previous dealing with the criminal justice system, [our solicitor] gave us excellent advice and guided us through a nightmare to achieve a just and correct outcome. [Our lawyer] was both forthright and compassionate in her handling of our case.

Malcolm, Belair

[My lawyer] explained all the legal terms in language I could understand – she was very easy to talk to.

Cameron, Munno Para

I felt confident knowing my matter was in good hands. Very professional!

Shravan, Christie Downs

Initial phone call was fantastic and the role of an executor was fully explained.

Penny, Henley Beach

The service I received was efficient and promptly finalised. The solicitor clearly explained the details and I was happy with how easy it was.

Dale, Fairview Park

[My lawyer] was exactly the lawyer I needed in a serious matter. The outcome was as predicted which was a fantastic result. I received prompt professional and personal service at all times. Capable and supportive in a very stressful period.

Jason, Munno Para West

I had any of my concerns answered to my satisfaction and understanding.

Valda, Ingle Farm

[My lawyer] is an excellent professional lawyer who assisted in achieving a great positive outcome/result. I sincerely thank you and your great staff for your assistance and guidance throughout my claim. Would highly recommend [my lawyer], staff and Websters Lawyers. Kept fully informed and guided, professionally throughout the matter.

Rena, Northgate

Our work was dealt with very efficiently and speedily. Our lawyer was very professional, at the same time as being approachable. Communication was great.

Christina, Highbury

My experience with Websters Lawyers was far beyond what I expected. From the moment I spoke to [my lawyer] she made me feel very comfortable and eased my stress. In my case I had a court appearance the day before we were scheduled to fly to Spain, Considering my first appointment with her was only 2 weeks before the court hearing, she was able to obtain the police statement and thoroughly work on my case within that limited time frame. She was very knowledgeable, understanding and confident which greatly relieved so much pressure from me and my family. At court, she explained everything thoroughly and advised me of all the possible outcomes. Price, service and result, very highly recommended. Thank you Websters Lawyers.

Rafael, Davoren Park

I have high expectations and they were met. Websters service was swift, courteous, professional and met the agreed budget. I will recommend Websters to my family, friends and colleagues. Thank you.

Peter, Forestville

I would recommend Websters Lawyers, especially for [my lawyer's] dedication and exemplary attitude and advice. She is the epitome of a good lawyer. The service was impeccable.

Pamela, West Lakes

[My lawyer] was very professional and I was made comfortable to understand.

Gregory, Penfield

I was very pleased with the end result and how well [my lawyer] conducted herself.

Sonya, Glanville

Very professional.

Jesse, Morphett Vale

[My lawyer] has been very prompt , reliable and provided a high level of communication.

Peter, Parkside

My experience at Websters was very positive. The stress was taken from me and I could not be happier with the outcome. [My lawyer] at Websters was professional, personable, available and caring. Thank you for making the experience stress free.

Magda, Holden Hill

Found my lawyer upfront and reliable – I would highly recommend Websters Lawyers.

Lee, Evanston Park


Top bunch of solicitors and admin staff. Very friendly and to the point service.

Bradley, Hallett Cove

Websters Lawyers were very professional in their service, I would be happy to recommend them.

Carole, Tea Tree Gully

We would not hesitate in recommending Websters for any legal matter. They are professional and courteous at all times and call back when they say they will.

David and Dianne, Lockleys


I fully recommend Websters Lawyers. This was the 3rd time myself & my family have used Websters Lawyers. In these stressful times we have found them to answer and guide us through the process needed to accomplish the legal requirements in a timely and courteous manner.

Dianne, Lynton

Solid, to the point, no hustle. Highly recommend.

George, Windsor Gardens

Contact us

Adelaide Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8231 1363
F: ( 08 ) 8231 5529

Ridgehaven Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8395 8000
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

Smithfield Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8487 0150
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

© Copyright WebstersLawyers.com 2017 All Rights Reserved
Website By A to Z Marketing