Detroit, Michigan, USA - April 20, 2011: viewed through Chrome web browser. Google Inc is an American multinational public corporation invested in Internet search, cloud computing, and advertising technologies.

– By Glen Pearce

Have you ever Googled your own name and been concerned with the results?

A Queensland man recently made a legal claim against internet giant Google, alleging that defamatory material that had been previously removed from its search engine had been made available again to Google users. He has claimed damages of $750,000.

This case is just one of a number that have been launched against Google in recent years, suggesting that search engines must now take some responsibility for defamatory material that is published on the internet.

What is defamation?

Defamation occurs when a communication damages a person’s reputation. It can be verbal or written.

For example, rumours that someone has spread about you can amount to defamation. A newspaper article that makes false statements about you can also be defamation.

To be able to take legal action for defamation, the allegations must be false and they must be published in some way. That means that other people hear or read about the allegations. Those people must also be able to identify you as the target. For example, your name may be used, or enough information is given so that people can work out that the comments are about you.

The publisher is liable for the defamation. The publisher may be the person who spoke the words or the newspaper or internet site that published the article. And, as we will see, this now extends to the search engine that published search results that are in themselves defamatory.

Some recent cases highlight the Court’s attitudes to internet search engines and defamation.

Duffy v Google

A website published a series of posts about a woman claiming that she stalked and harassed psychics, that she was a liar and had engaged in professional and criminal misconduct. The woman noticed that when she searched her name on Google, a defamatory “auto complete” search term was displayed that linked to these articles. She took action against Google for defamation.

The Supreme Court found that even though Google had not published the original articles, it had published the defamatory search term. This meant that it had published defamatory material about the woman.

The Court awarded the woman $115,000.00 in damages.

Google appealed but the Full Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, confirming that the search results were capable of conveying a defamatory meaning.

Trkulja v Google

In June 2004, a man was dining at a Melbourne restaurant when he was shot in the back by a gunman wearing a balaclava.  The gunman fled the scene after his gun jammed as he prepared to fire a second shot at the man.

The man later told police that he knew the identity of the gunman and those who hired him.  He said the gunman was offered $10,000 to kill him.

In 2009, after website material was published, a Google search produced website links and images about the incident. This same material reappeared in 2013 and when a user of the Google search engine entered the words “Melbourne criminal underworld photos” (or similar), the man’s image appeared alongside images of other well-known Melbourne underworld identities.

The man asked Google to fix the problem and then when it failed to do so, he sued Google for defamation.

Google said that it hadn’t published the material – it had simply come up in search results. But the Court found that once the man had notified Google about the material, Google’s failure to remove it meant that Google became responsible for the material’s presence and so became a “publisher” of the material.

The Court found that Google, as a search engine operator, was capable of being a publisher of the defamatory material. Simply because it was a search engine didn’t mean that it could avoid liability for defamation.

Appeal: Google v Trkulja

Google appealed to the Victorian Supreme Court. The Court said that usually when a search engine publishes search results it should be accountable as a publisher of the results.

The Court found that the material wasn’t defamatory. This was because all of the pages on all of the websites would need to be linked with the search terms in order for someone to reach the same conclusion that the man had reached. It was unlikely that many others would use the internet in this way.

The Court also discussed whether search engines such as Google should be immune from liability for defamation. Given the massive amount of material available on the internet, the issue of search results being produced by the search engine’s automated process was “acute”.

The Court said that it should be up to State governments to decide how to deal with this issue by passing new laws.

What does it mean?

The first two cases show that search engines are now required to more actively respond and act on complaints about defamatory material being linked in internet searches.

But the Trkulja Appeal suggests that search engines may be able to defend their publication of defamatory material by arguing that they didn’t know the material was there and didn’t mean to distribute it. Also, in the future they may be protected by legislation. These aspects of the decision were speculation and can’t be considered binding, so for the time being at least, search engines must still be vigilant about dealing with complaints of defamation.

It may be that some search results will be blocked or censored as otherwise there is potential for endless claims to be filed by people who say that they have been defamed.

The law has often struggled to keep apace with technology, and so there are probably benefits all round if search engines are now required to be more accountable and careful about the search results that they publish.

If you believe that you have been defamed, or if someone is claiming that you have defamed them, Websters Lawyers has excellent experience and can provide advice to help you to decide what to do. Contact us today for a free first interview.

Duffy v Google Inc [2017] SASCFC 130(4 October 2017)

Trkullja v Google Inc [2015] VSC 635 (17 November 2015)





call now

*Conditions Apply


Having such a short time frame I was very impressed with the outcome made by [my solicitor]. Excellent and timely manner


Kurralta Park

Very professional mannerism and overall great outcome was delivered by Websters Lawyers.


West Ryde NSW

Helpful, explained fully, patient, excellent service.



Patient and helpful in explaining the process.



Call Websters Lawyers for a most professional and friendly service. All understanding with [my solicitors] and the reception staff. Thank you so much.



Making my will was effortless on my part, with everything explained clearly. Well done to all.



Great service, professional, explains things clearly, definitely recommend Websters Lawyers.


Upper Hermitage

Patient, professional, good communication about procedures and probable outcomes.



Thank you for all your work over the course of the case. You [both] were always very approachable and I appreciated your understanding and professionalism in all areas.


Christie Downs

All in all my experience was great. Thank you for your time and expertise.


Seacombe Gardens

My matter was dealt with efficiently and was explained in an understandable language. A pleasant experience.



Practical and very helpful. Reasons and explanations given where needed



I stumbled across Websters in the Yellow Pages and I rang, explained my situation and immediately they took my case on. Greatly appreciate their services.



The service from Websters Lawyers was outstanding. [My solicitor] was caring, had patience and was very professional. Wonderful personality.



[My solicitor] made everything so simple to understand. [The receptionist] was wicked too, would recommend them anytime. Level of entire service was outstanding.


Golden Grove


I had dealings with Websters over 20 years ago. They were my first choice when I recently needed legal advice. Both legal and office staff were professional, courteous and accessible at all times. Everything was explained up front in a clear and concise manner. I would not hesitate to recommend their services.



It has truly been a pleasure communicating with you throughout the process. I really appreciate your patient and speedy replies to my questions and requests. You were always able to provide an easily understood response and this helped me deal with the process. Your friendly and positive manner encouraged me to seek your advice.


Battery Hill QLD

[My lawyer's] service was prompt and efficient with all questions explained clearly with all our requests carried out within the laws. Overall service was very satisfactory.


Wynn Vale

[My lawyer] was excellent. 



Excellent service. Professional. Clear advice and instructions. Prompt actions. Overall 10/10!


Ingle Farm

Overall, I was happy with my outcome and my lawyer, would definitely recommend [my lawyer].



[My solicitor] was excellent at helping us through preparing our wills which were particularly challenging as they involved assets in multiple countries. She was professional and knowledgeable and spent time tailoring the wills to our needs.



[My solicitor] was very helpful, respectful and polite. She made sure I understood the process and documentation of our wills.



Professional. Smooth Transaction. 


Largs North

I found the whole experience from Receptionist to Solicitor excellent. They completely put us at our ease.



This was a new experience for us and didn’t have a clue what to do. [Our solicitor] on our first visit put us at ease, explained what will happen, pointed out there was a strong case. [Our solicitor] was genuine in her approach, kept us well informed, explained actions several times with patience and understanding. Overall very happy with the service we received.


Elizabeth Vale

[My lawyer] was very reassuring in her approach to my case. I felt that every possibility in terms of evidence to provide and possible outcomes were explained to me, The result of the case was the best possible outcome I could have expected.

David, Belair


With no previous dealing with the criminal justice system, [our solicitor] gave us excellent advice and guided us through a nightmare to achieve a just and correct outcome. [Our lawyer] was both forthright and compassionate in her handling of our case.

Malcolm, Belair

[My lawyer] explained all the legal terms in language I could understand – she was very easy to talk to.

Cameron, Munno Para

I felt confident knowing my matter was in good hands. Very professional!

Shravan, Christie Downs

Initial phone call was fantastic and the role of an executor was fully explained.

Penny, Henley Beach

The service I received was efficient and promptly finalised. The solicitor clearly explained the details and I was happy with how easy it was.

Dale, Fairview Park

[My lawyer] was exactly the lawyer I needed in a serious matter. The outcome was as predicted which was a fantastic result. I received prompt professional and personal service at all times. Capable and supportive in a very stressful period.

Jason, Munno Para West

I had any of my concerns answered to my satisfaction and understanding.

Valda, Ingle Farm

[My lawyer] is an excellent professional lawyer who assisted in achieving a great positive outcome/result. I sincerely thank you and your great staff for your assistance and guidance throughout my claim. Would highly recommend [my lawyer], staff and Websters Lawyers. Kept fully informed and guided, professionally throughout the matter.

Rena, Northgate

Our work was dealt with very efficiently and speedily. Our lawyer was very professional, at the same time as being approachable. Communication was great.

Christina, Highbury

My experience with Websters Lawyers was far beyond what I expected. From the moment I spoke to [my lawyer] she made me feel very comfortable and eased my stress. In my case I had a court appearance the day before we were scheduled to fly to Spain, Considering my first appointment with her was only 2 weeks before the court hearing, she was able to obtain the police statement and thoroughly work on my case within that limited time frame. She was very knowledgeable, understanding and confident which greatly relieved so much pressure from me and my family. At court, she explained everything thoroughly and advised me of all the possible outcomes. Price, service and result, very highly recommended. Thank you Websters Lawyers.

Rafael, Davoren Park

I have high expectations and they were met. Websters service was swift, courteous, professional and met the agreed budget. I will recommend Websters to my family, friends and colleagues. Thank you.

Peter, Forestville

I would recommend Websters Lawyers, especially for [my lawyer's] dedication and exemplary attitude and advice. She is the epitome of a good lawyer. The service was impeccable.

Pamela, West Lakes

[My lawyer] was very professional and I was made comfortable to understand.

Gregory, Penfield

I was very pleased with the end result and how well [my lawyer] conducted herself.

Sonya, Glanville

Very professional.

Jesse, Morphett Vale

[My lawyer] has been very prompt , reliable and provided a high level of communication.

Peter, Parkside

My experience at Websters was very positive. The stress was taken from me and I could not be happier with the outcome. [My lawyer] at Websters was professional, personable, available and caring. Thank you for making the experience stress free.

Magda, Holden Hill

Found my lawyer upfront and reliable – I would highly recommend Websters Lawyers.

Lee, Evanston Park


Top bunch of solicitors and admin staff. Very friendly and to the point service.

Bradley, Hallett Cove

Websters Lawyers were very professional in their service, I would be happy to recommend them.

Carole, Tea Tree Gully

We would not hesitate in recommending Websters for any legal matter. They are professional and courteous at all times and call back when they say they will.

David and Dianne, Lockleys


I fully recommend Websters Lawyers. This was the 3rd time myself & my family have used Websters Lawyers. In these stressful times we have found them to answer and guide us through the process needed to accomplish the legal requirements in a timely and courteous manner.

Dianne, Lynton

Solid, to the point, no hustle. Highly recommend.

George, Windsor Gardens

Contact Us

Adelaide Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8231 1363
F: ( 08 ) 8231 5529

Ridgehaven Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8395 8000
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

Smithfield Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8487 0150
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

© Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved
Website By A to Z Marketing