Nature vs nurture – how important is it to be the “biological” parent?

Nature vs Nurture – How Important Is It To Be The “Biological” Parent?

Same sex relationships, surrogacy, sperm donation, adoption and IVF.  When the Court decides who a child should live with or spend time with just how significant is it to be the biological parent?

 

who is the real father

Court Decisions Regarding Parents Rights

Two recent and highly contested Court decisions regarding parenting rights have looked at the significance of being a “biological” parent in providing access and care to a child.  In one matter, the High Court overturned a previous finding and held that a sperm donor may be regarded as a parent in certain circumstances.  In another case, though a DNA test confirmed that a child was the result of an extramarital affair, the mother’s attempts of prohibiting the child’s contact with her former husband were unsuccessful.

The term “parent” is not wholly defined within the Family Law Act, and neither state nor federal laws are definitive as to whether sperm donors may automatically be considered parents.   Nevertheless, the key consideration as these cases highlight is that the wellbeing of the child is given higher consideration than any wishes of the “parents”.

Donor Dads

Recently the High Court was asked to identify the legal parents of a child conceived between a gay man (“Robert”) and his close lesbian friend (“Susan”). The two biological “parents” had been friends for 25 years and chose to have a child together by artificial insemination in 2006.

Robert had fathered the child with the intention of acting as the father, and had contributed to the child’s care, welfare, education and financial support.  The child had an “extremely positive, close and secure relationship” with Robert and he was named as the child’s father on her birth certificate.

In 2015, Susan married her partner (“Margaret”) in New Zealand. Susan and Margaret had previously had a child together through a private IVF program. Both children referred to Robert as “Daddy” and he was actively involved in both of their lives.

When the children were aged 9 and 10, Susan and Margaret attempted to move them to New Zealand. Though Robert was initially able to prevent this move, Susan and Margaret appealed successfully to the Full Court of the Family Court on the basis that the laws in most Australian states rule out sperm donors as being considered the “parent” of the resulting child.

Robert subsequently appealed to the High Court. Although Susan argued that Robert was meant to act strictly as a donor who visited occasionally, the Court found that Robert had contributed significantly to the child’s life, was viewed by the child as her father, and was a positive participant in her social and psychological parenting.

The Court also gave great weight to Robert’s intention and belief that he would be a father when he had provided his sperm, and that Margaret was not Susan’s de facto partner at the time of the child’s birth and was therefore not an intended parent.

Robert, though a sperm donor not in a relationship with the biological mother, was deemed a “parent” in the ordinary and contemporary sense of the word, and was given the right to spend time with the child as her parent.

Susan and Margaret argued that this decision gave more weight to the child’s attachment to Robert due to a societal norm that children have fathers. The Court dismissed their suggestion of “‘hetero-normative” bias as a misunderstanding of the Court’s duty of putting the best interests of the child first and preserving their most meaningful relationships.

Genetics Aren’t Everything

The matter of Maldon & Gabard demonstrated the same principle in a reverse situation.

In that case, a husband and wife had gone through multiple IVF cycles without success, until they finally achieved conception of a baby boy in 2013. They considered him to be a miracle baby and were both elated at his birth.

But the child’s conception was not a miracle at all.

The parties had separated in April 2015, after which time the “father”, or “Mr Maldon” spent regular and frequent time with the child. In September 2015, Mr Maldon undertook a DNA test which revealed that he was not the biological father of the child, and that the child was in fact a result of an extramarital affair.

Upon Mr Maldon informing the mother of this fact, the mother immediately ceased Mr Maldon’s care of the child on the basis that he was not the biological father.  It was only a year later (after being granted Court Orders) that Mr Maldon was permitted to spend supervised time with the child. The child was initially distressed at his interaction with Mr Maldon, and was not permitted to call Mr Maldon “dad”.

The mother did not wish for the child to spend any time at all with Mr Maldon, and disputed this time. The mother went as far as to remove herself and the child from Mr Maldon’s health care (provided to her free of charge) in order to distance the child from Mr Maldon.

The court found that Mr Maldon had spent a significant portion of the child’s life being known by the child in a positive manner, he had bonded with the child before he was even born, and that his desire to play a parental role in the child’s life was due to his love for the child. It was found that the mother had an almost “hysterical aversion” to Mr Maldon being involved with the child, and that her choice to remove herself and the child from the benefits of private health cover as that might have been held against her in the proceedings spoke volumes as to her lack of reason in the matter.

It was ordered that it was in the child’s best interests that Mr Maldon play a part in the child’s life. Mr Maldon was to only present himself as a friend, and would not have parental care of the child, but would have a right to access the child on set dates for court-determined spaces of time.

The Takeaway

Biological parents or not, the Court is increasingly interested in what role a person plays in a child’s life and their contributions to that child rather than what is strictly dictated by legislation. In these two cases we can see that the definition of “parent” has been interpreted by the Court in its ordinary meaning, and that it may be a person’s actions which make them a parent rather than a biological connection.

If you have questions regarding your access or parenting rights for a child, give Websters Lawyers a call on 8231 1363 or contact us here. Our experienced family law solicitors would be happy to provide you with a free first consultation to help you better understand your rights and what may be considered the best outcome for your family.

 

Masson v Parsons [2019] HCA 21

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2019/21.html

Maldon & Gabard [2018] FCCA 472

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCCA/2018/472.html

FREE FIRST INTERVIEW

NO WIN NO FEE

LOCAL LAWYERS FOR LOCAL NEEDS

GET THE RIGHT LAWYER FIRST

call now

Testimonials

Having such a short time frame I was very impressed with the outcome made by [my solicitor]. Excellent and timely manner

Sebastian

Kurralta Park

Very professional mannerism and overall great outcome was delivered by Websters Lawyers.

Nicholas

West Ryde NSW

Helpful, explained fully, patient, excellent service.

Kerry

Ridgehaven

Patient and helpful in explaining the process.

Brian

Ridgehaven

Call Websters Lawyers for a most professional and friendly service. All understanding with [my solicitors] and the reception staff. Thank you so much.

Christine

Magill

Making my will was effortless on my part, with everything explained clearly. Well done to all.

Christina

Highbury

Great service, professional, explains things clearly, definitely recommend Websters Lawyers.

Garth

Upper Hermitage

Patient, professional, good communication about procedures and probable outcomes.

Jeffrey

Brompton

Thank you for all your work over the course of the case. You [both] were always very approachable and I appreciated your understanding and professionalism in all areas.

Alexis

Christie Downs

All in all my experience was great. Thank you for your time and expertise.

Christina

Seacombe Gardens

My matter was dealt with efficiently and was explained in an understandable language. A pleasant experience.

Mary

Ridgehaven

Practical and very helpful. Reasons and explanations given where needed

John

Ridgehaven

I stumbled across Websters in the Yellow Pages and I rang, explained my situation and immediately they took my case on. Greatly appreciate their services.

Diane 

Ridgehaven

The service from Websters Lawyers was outstanding. [My solicitor] was caring, had patience and was very professional. Wonderful personality.

Julie

Yorketown

[My solicitor] made everything so simple to understand. [The receptionist] was wicked too, would recommend them anytime. Level of entire service was outstanding.

Craig

Golden Grove

 

I had dealings with Websters over 20 years ago. They were my first choice when I recently needed legal advice. Both legal and office staff were professional, courteous and accessible at all times. Everything was explained up front in a clear and concise manner. I would not hesitate to recommend their services.

Rod

Dernancourt

It has truly been a pleasure communicating with you throughout the process. I really appreciate your patient and speedy replies to my questions and requests. You were always able to provide an easily understood response and this helped me deal with the process. Your friendly and positive manner encouraged me to seek your advice.

Kathleen

Battery Hill QLD

[My lawyer's] service was prompt and efficient with all questions explained clearly with all our requests carried out within the laws. Overall service was very satisfactory.

John

Wynn Vale

[My lawyer] was excellent. 

Gordon

Glengowrie

Excellent service. Professional. Clear advice and instructions. Prompt actions. Overall 10/10!

Phillip

Ingle Farm

Overall, I was happy with my outcome and my lawyer, would definitely recommend [my lawyer].

Janet

Adelaide

[My solicitor] was excellent at helping us through preparing our wills which were particularly challenging as they involved assets in multiple countries. She was professional and knowledgeable and spent time tailoring the wills to our needs.

Jonathan

Greenwith

[My solicitor] was very helpful, respectful and polite. She made sure I understood the process and documentation of our wills.

Rachel

Greenwith

Professional. Smooth Transaction. 

Luke

Largs North

I found the whole experience from Receptionist to Solicitor excellent. They completely put us at our ease.

Ethel

Smithfield

This was a new experience for us and didn’t have a clue what to do. [Our solicitor] on our first visit put us at ease, explained what will happen, pointed out there was a strong case. [Our solicitor] was genuine in her approach, kept us well informed, explained actions several times with patience and understanding. Overall very happy with the service we received.

Stephen

Elizabeth Vale

[My lawyer] was very reassuring in her approach to my case. I felt that every possibility in terms of evidence to provide and possible outcomes were explained to me, The result of the case was the best possible outcome I could have expected.

David, Belair

 

With no previous dealing with the criminal justice system, [our solicitor] gave us excellent advice and guided us through a nightmare to achieve a just and correct outcome. [Our lawyer] was both forthright and compassionate in her handling of our case.

Malcolm, Belair

[My lawyer] explained all the legal terms in language I could understand – she was very easy to talk to.

Cameron, Munno Para

I felt confident knowing my matter was in good hands. Very professional!

Shravan, Christie Downs

Initial phone call was fantastic and the role of an executor was fully explained.

Penny, Henley Beach

The service I received was efficient and promptly finalised. The solicitor clearly explained the details and I was happy with how easy it was.

Dale, Fairview Park

[My lawyer] was exactly the lawyer I needed in a serious matter. The outcome was as predicted which was a fantastic result. I received prompt professional and personal service at all times. Capable and supportive in a very stressful period.

Jason, Munno Para West

I had any of my concerns answered to my satisfaction and understanding.

Valda, Ingle Farm

[My lawyer] is an excellent professional lawyer who assisted in achieving a great positive outcome/result. I sincerely thank you and your great staff for your assistance and guidance throughout my claim. Would highly recommend [my lawyer], staff and Websters Lawyers. Kept fully informed and guided, professionally throughout the matter.

Rena, Northgate

Our work was dealt with very efficiently and speedily. Our lawyer was very professional, at the same time as being approachable. Communication was great.

Christina, Highbury

My experience with Websters Lawyers was far beyond what I expected. From the moment I spoke to [my lawyer] she made me feel very comfortable and eased my stress. In my case I had a court appearance the day before we were scheduled to fly to Spain, Considering my first appointment with her was only 2 weeks before the court hearing, she was able to obtain the police statement and thoroughly work on my case within that limited time frame. She was very knowledgeable, understanding and confident which greatly relieved so much pressure from me and my family. At court, she explained everything thoroughly and advised me of all the possible outcomes. Price, service and result, very highly recommended. Thank you Websters Lawyers.

Rafael, Davoren Park

I have high expectations and they were met. Websters service was swift, courteous, professional and met the agreed budget. I will recommend Websters to my family, friends and colleagues. Thank you.

Peter, Forestville

I would recommend Websters Lawyers, especially for [my lawyer's] dedication and exemplary attitude and advice. She is the epitome of a good lawyer. The service was impeccable.

Pamela, West Lakes

[My lawyer] was very professional and I was made comfortable to understand.

Gregory, Penfield

I was very pleased with the end result and how well [my lawyer] conducted herself.

Sonya, Glanville

Very professional.

Jesse, Morphett Vale

[My lawyer] has been very prompt , reliable and provided a high level of communication.

Peter, Parkside

My experience at Websters was very positive. The stress was taken from me and I could not be happier with the outcome. [My lawyer] at Websters was professional, personable, available and caring. Thank you for making the experience stress free.

Magda, Holden Hill

Found my lawyer upfront and reliable – I would highly recommend Websters Lawyers.

Lee, Evanston Park

 

Top bunch of solicitors and admin staff. Very friendly and to the point service.

Bradley, Hallett Cove

Websters Lawyers were very professional in their service, I would be happy to recommend them.

Carole, Tea Tree Gully

We would not hesitate in recommending Websters for any legal matter. They are professional and courteous at all times and call back when they say they will.

David and Dianne, Lockleys

 

I fully recommend Websters Lawyers. This was the 3rd time myself & my family have used Websters Lawyers. In these stressful times we have found them to answer and guide us through the process needed to accomplish the legal requirements in a timely and courteous manner.

Dianne, Lynton

Solid, to the point, no hustle. Highly recommend.

George, Windsor Gardens

Contact us

Adelaide Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8231 1363
F: ( 08 ) 8231 5529

Ridgehaven Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8395 8000
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

Smithfield Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8487 0150
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

© Copyright WebstersLawyers.com 2017 All Rights Reserved
Website By A to Z Marketing