$600,000 FOR NOT WEARING A SEATBELT – WHO’S AT FAULT?
A woman who was left a paraplegic after suffering catastrophic injuries in a car accident appealed the decision of a Court to reduce her damages of $2,400,000 by nearly $600,000 because she wasn’t wearing a seatbelt.
The case involved provisions under the Civil Liability Act that reduce a person’s claim for damages as a result of a car accident by 25% if they were not wearing a seatbelt regardless of whether that was the reason for the injury. It also concerned a separate section that reduces a passenger’s damages by 50% if the accident is caused by the fact that the driver had a blood alcohol reading of 0.15% or more and the passenger was aware or should have been aware that the driver was intoxicated.
The 21 year old woman who was pregnant at the time had been driving with her de facto partner and a friend in the early hours of the morning around Port Victoria looking for cigarettes and a telephone box having left three children at their Hotel. She stopped the car just outside the town to go to the toilet and her drunk partner with a blood alcohol level of 0.22% got into the driver’s seat. The woman gave evidence that her partner told her to get into the car so she climbed into the backseat and he drove off before she had shut the door. She tried to put on her seatbelt but due to his erratic driving and her tugging on the belt too quickly the mechanism locked. After only about 650 metres the partner failed to take a right hand curve and collided with a tree as a result of which she was thrown out of the car suffering serious spinal injuries which left her a paraplegic.
The case highlights the difficulties that arise when the Court must decide whether the reductions in compensation for not wearing a seatbelt or travelling with a drunk driver should be applied.
Section 47 of the Civil Liability Act relates to when a person is injured by relying on the care and skill of an intoxicated person. If the person is over 16 years of age and was aware, or ought to have been aware, that the driver was intoxicated then their damages will be reduced by 50% if the driver’s blood alcohol reading is 0.15% or more. This can be overcome by proving that the intoxication didn’t contribute to the accident or that the injured person could not reasonably be expected to have avoided the risk. Where this can become difficult is that the question of whether a person could have avoided the risk involves an objective standard without regard to the personal circumstances of the individual.
The evidence was that the woman had been with her de facto all day and must have seen him drinking many times. Therefore, it was argued that any reasonable person in her position would have realised that they were only a five minute walk from the town with no significant danger in walking the short distance even at that hour, so they would not have impulsively jumped into a car driven by someone who had drunk excessively that day. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court noted that such matters are not to be judged against the standard of a perfectly rational decision- maker equipped with the relevant statistical evidence. Was it safer for a pregnant 21 year old to walk alone on an unlit road at 2.00 am or to get into a car with a driver who has been drinking all day to travel only a short distance so as to get back quickly to the three young children at the Hotel? It was an unexpected and confusing situation made worse by the fact that her partner by aggressively directing her to get into the car created a situation in which she had to make a choice in the agony of the moment. The Court concluded that in these circumstances the woman could not reasonably have been expected to avoid the risk and so there was no reduction in her damages on this basis.
Failing to wear a seatbelt is a different issue in that it doesn’t have to be the cause of the injury. Section 49 of the Civil Liability Act says that if a person above 16 years of age is injured in a car accident and wasn’t wearing a seatbelt as required under the Road Traffic Act then their damages are reduced by 25% without exception. The Judge who first heard the case held the view that the woman had sufficient opportunity to fasten her seatbelt if she had just taken her time rather than tugging on it too quickly. The Supreme Court however concluded that the man’s erratic driving which involved acceleration and swerving from time to time was likely to have caused the mechanism to lock and it would be understandable for any person to yank or pull at the seatbelt. The Court said that it would be unrealistic to expect a passenger in those circumstances to be sufficiently calm and collected. In these circumstances, the woman had not failed to wear a seatbelt as required by the Road Traffic Act, because the reasons were out of her control, and were in fact due to the actions of the driver. This was not a case where the person simply refused through laziness, inadvertence or carelessness to wear the seatbelt and therefore the 25% reduction should not apply.
When a person is injured in a car accident that also involves failure to wear a seatbelt or drink driving there will at times be a need to closely analyse the circumstances of the case to determine whether these mandatory reductions in damages are to be applied. This case demonstrates how significant such reductions can be and the need to gather and present all relevant evidence. An experienced personal injury lawyer at Websters Lawyers can assist to advise anyone injured in a car accident on whether and how these provisions are likely to apply to their case. For a free initial consultation with a specialist car accident Lawyer in Adelaide or the North East use our Contact pageto submit an enquiry or call our office today.
FREE FIRST INTERVIEW
NO WIN NO FEE*
LOCAL LAWYERS FOR LOCAL NEEDS
GET THE RIGHT LAWYER FIRST
Having such a short time frame I was very impressed with the outcome made by [my solicitor]. Excellent and timely manner
Very professional mannerism and overall great outcome was delivered by Websters Lawyers.
West Ryde NSW
Helpful, explained fully, patient, excellent service.
Patient and helpful in explaining the process.
Call Websters Lawyers for a most professional and friendly service. All understanding with [my solicitors] and the reception staff. Thank you so much.
Making my will was effortless on my part, with everything explained clearly. Well done to all.
Great service, professional, explains things clearly, definitely recommend Websters Lawyers.
Patient, professional, good communication about procedures and probable outcomes.
Thank you for all your work over the course of the case. You [both] were always very approachable and I appreciated your understanding and professionalism in all areas.
All in all my experience was great. Thank you for your time and expertise.
My matter was dealt with efficiently and was explained in an understandable language. A pleasant experience.
Practical and very helpful. Reasons and explanations given where needed
I stumbled across Websters in the Yellow Pages and I rang, explained my situation and immediately they took my case on. Greatly appreciate their services.
The service from Websters Lawyers was outstanding. [My solicitor] was caring, had patience and was very professional. Wonderful personality.
[My solicitor] made everything so simple to understand. [The receptionist] was wicked too, would recommend them anytime. Level of entire service was outstanding.
I had dealings with Websters over 20 years ago. They were my first choice when I recently needed legal advice. Both legal and office staff were professional, courteous and accessible at all times. Everything was explained up front in a clear and concise manner. I would not hesitate to recommend their services.
It has truly been a pleasure communicating with you throughout the process. I really appreciate your patient and speedy replies to my questions and requests. You were always able to provide an easily understood response and this helped me deal with the process. Your friendly and positive manner encouraged me to seek your advice.
Battery Hill QLD
[My lawyer's] service was prompt and efficient with all questions explained clearly with all our requests carried out within the laws. Overall service was very satisfactory.
[My lawyer] was excellent.
Excellent service. Professional. Clear advice and instructions. Prompt actions. Overall 10/10!
Overall, I was happy with my outcome and my lawyer, would definitely recommend [my lawyer].
[My solicitor] was excellent at helping us through preparing our wills which were particularly challenging as they involved assets in multiple countries. She was professional and knowledgeable and spent time tailoring the wills to our needs.
[My solicitor] was very helpful, respectful and polite. She made sure I understood the process and documentation of our wills.
Professional. Smooth Transaction.
I found the whole experience from Receptionist to Solicitor excellent. They completely put us at our ease.
This was a new experience for us and didn’t have a clue what to do. [Our solicitor] on our first visit put us at ease, explained what will happen, pointed out there was a strong case. [Our solicitor] was genuine in her approach, kept us well informed, explained actions several times with patience and understanding. Overall very happy with the service we received.
[My lawyer] was very reassuring in her approach to my case. I felt that every possibility in terms of evidence to provide and possible outcomes were explained to me, The result of the case was the best possible outcome I could have expected.
With no previous dealing with the criminal justice system, [our solicitor] gave us excellent advice and guided us through a nightmare to achieve a just and correct outcome. [Our lawyer] was both forthright and compassionate in her handling of our case.
[My lawyer] explained all the legal terms in language I could understand – she was very easy to talk to.
Cameron, Munno Para
I felt confident knowing my matter was in good hands. Very professional!
Shravan, Christie Downs
Initial phone call was fantastic and the role of an executor was fully explained.
Penny, Henley Beach
The service I received was efficient and promptly finalised. The solicitor clearly explained the details and I was happy with how easy it was.
Dale, Fairview Park
[My lawyer] was exactly the lawyer I needed in a serious matter. The outcome was as predicted which was a fantastic result. I received prompt professional and personal service at all times. Capable and supportive in a very stressful period.
Jason, Munno Para West
I had any of my concerns answered to my satisfaction and understanding.
Valda, Ingle Farm
[My lawyer] is an excellent professional lawyer who assisted in achieving a great positive outcome/result. I sincerely thank you and your great staff for your assistance and guidance throughout my claim. Would highly recommend [my lawyer], staff and Websters Lawyers. Kept fully informed and guided, professionally throughout the matter.
Our work was dealt with very efficiently and speedily. Our lawyer was very professional, at the same time as being approachable. Communication was great.
My experience with Websters Lawyers was far beyond what I expected. From the moment I spoke to [my lawyer] she made me feel very comfortable and eased my stress. In my case I had a court appearance the day before we were scheduled to fly to Spain, Considering my first appointment with her was only 2 weeks before the court hearing, she was able to obtain the police statement and thoroughly work on my case within that limited time frame. She was very knowledgeable, understanding and confident which greatly relieved so much pressure from me and my family. At court, she explained everything thoroughly and advised me of all the possible outcomes. Price, service and result, very highly recommended. Thank you Websters Lawyers.
Rafael, Davoren Park
I have high expectations and they were met. Websters service was swift, courteous, professional and met the agreed budget. I will recommend Websters to my family, friends and colleagues. Thank you.
I would recommend Websters Lawyers, especially for [my lawyer's] dedication and exemplary attitude and advice. She is the epitome of a good lawyer. The service was impeccable.
Pamela, West Lakes
[My lawyer] was very professional and I was made comfortable to understand.
I was very pleased with the end result and how well [my lawyer] conducted herself.
Jesse, Morphett Vale
[My lawyer] has been very prompt , reliable and provided a high level of communication.
My experience at Websters was very positive. The stress was taken from me and I could not be happier with the outcome. [My lawyer] at Websters was professional, personable, available and caring. Thank you for making the experience stress free.
Magda, Holden Hill
Found my lawyer upfront and reliable – I would highly recommend Websters Lawyers.
Lee, Evanston Park
Top bunch of solicitors and admin staff. Very friendly and to the point service.
Bradley, Hallett Cove
Websters Lawyers were very professional in their service, I would be happy to recommend them.
Carole, Tea Tree Gully
We would not hesitate in recommending Websters for any legal matter. They are professional and courteous at all times and call back when they say they will.
David and Dianne, Lockleys
I fully recommend Websters Lawyers. This was the 3rd time myself & my family have used Websters Lawyers. In these stressful times we have found them to answer and guide us through the process needed to accomplish the legal requirements in a timely and courteous manner.
Solid, to the point, no hustle. Highly recommend.
George, Windsor Gardens