It wasn’t ‘accidental’ touching - $30,000 for victim of sexual harassment at work

A Foodland employee who suffered sexual harassment at the hands of her male co-worker has been awarded compensation against both him and the employer after the South Australian Employment Tribunal found that the physical contact he had with her was more than the ‘accidental touching’ that he claimed.

The harassment involved inappropriate touching and comments that started shortly after the male co-worker commenced employment and culminated in an act of extremely inappropriate touching.

A male food service worker improperly touching a female colleague in a commercial kitchen.  He has his arm around her waist as she cooks at a stove. A concept on sexual harassment in the food service and restaurant industry.

The Sexual Harassment Claim

At the time, the woman was working in the ‘Juice Bar’ section of the Foodland store producing fresh juices for customers and preparing fruits and vegetables for the store café.  The male co-worker was employed as Executive Head Chef and Food & Beverage Services Manager, which included performing cooking demonstrations at a food preparation station located close to the Juice Bar.

From shortly after he started at the workplace, the co-worker began to refer to her as ‘sweetie’ or ‘darling’.  Although this made her feel uncomfortable she didn’t complain to him, other co-workers or management about it as she thought it would be regarded as too frivolous a matter to be making a formal complaint about.  She also didn’t think at the time that there was any ill-intention on his part.

After later events however, she took the view that this was in fact a form of ‘grooming’ leading up to his thinking that it was acceptable to touch her in an invasive manner, or conditioning her to accept that happening.

The co-worker on the other hand denied calling her ‘sweetie’ or ‘darling’ stating that he wouldn’t use those terms and that his standard form of address for a woman whose name he had forgotten was ‘bella’ which he viewed as being much the same as calling someone ‘mate’.  While the Tribunal found that he had addressed the woman in the manner she described, it noted that such terms are commonplace and are not sexual in nature.

It was the physical contact that was of greater concern.  The woman’s evidence was that the male co-worker would touch her as he walked by, or touch her on the shoulders or the middle of the back to get her attention or go around her.  Over time she noticed he walked past her more frequently, unnecessarily and in an increasingly invasive, aggressive and sexualised manner.  She said that he would pass her to reach a bin that was not conveniently located for his purposes.

He then began at times to put his hands on her lower back or hips as he moved past her, and on occasions he would brush the back side of his hands across her buttocks and lower back.  He would press against her unnecessarily when going past to the extent that she could feel his breath on her neck.  Even when it appeared there was room for him to pass her without contact, he would press the whole of the front of his body against her.

According to the male co-worker, the workstation was ‘like a submarine’ and staff would frequently need to get past one another in a confined space.  He denied the allegations, stating that what was alleged to have occurred either didn’t happen, or was the result of accidental contact which did not amount to sexual harassment.  However, his evidence was rejected by the Tribunal which concluded that slight accidental bumping might explain one or two incidents, but not the repeated incidents alleged by the woman.

These events culminated in a series of incidents on the one day.  That morning when she was standing at the Juice Bar and saw the co-worker coming toward her and pass behind her to use the bin.  She said that as he passed, he pushed the trunk of his body up against her with his hand squashed between her buttock and his body, and did the same thing on the way back.  About an hour later he repeated this behaviour and after he passed, she looked at him and made eye contact, seeing what she described as a ‘very sexual look on his face.’  On the same day he passed her again and in doing so slid his hand over her buttocks and down toward her vagina, pressing his body against her as before.  Because of the earlier incidents she kept her legs firmly together but was knocked off balance.  She said that she felt dirty, ashamed, upset and angry and told a nearby colleague that ‘the chef just touched my arse’ but the response was to the effect that ‘chefs had a tendency to act in such a way.’

A report was also made to the Assistant Store Manager who viewed security footage of the location with the HR Manager.  According to the Tribunal however, neither man treated the complaint seriously, nor took any statement from the woman or recorded what she said.  It concluded that they didn’t spend much time looking at the CCTV footage or carefully examining it which was destroyed shortly after.  Although the location of the camera wasn’t ideal, their evidence was that it showed one instance of contact between the two, when the man shuffled past the woman with his hands raised.  The Tribunal said that the ‘careless approach to the complaint and the viewing of the footage is an important element with respect to’ the employer’s liability.

The two continued to work near to each other although the woman stopped talking to or acknowledging the man, avoiding giving him any further chance to touch her.  Some six weeks later when she refused to prepare a juice for him, the male co-worker complained about her to management.  She then asked what had been done about her complaint and was told that the security footage didn’t show anything inappropriate so no further action had been taken.  She was then told that they would speak to the man and was later informed that he had said he wasn’t aware of what she had alleged but had offered to apologise.

The co-worker and the employer both suggested that the woman had fabricated her complaint at a later time for reasons related to her employment situation.  Nevertheless, the Tribunal found that the man had pressed his body against the woman and that by doing so he engaged in conduct that was sexual in nature and was extremely unwelcome.

Liability of the Employer

Vicarious liability in a case such as this refers to a ‘secondary liability’ that the employer has for the wrongful actions or omissions of its employees because it has the ‘right, ability or duty to control’ what the employee does while at work.

Under the Equal Opportunity Act it is presumed that the employer is vicariously liable for a discriminatory or unlawful act of an employee (who was acting in the course of their employment) unless it can be shown that the employer had taken reasonable and sufficient steps to prevent the harassment.

Here, the employer claimed that it was not liable for what had occurred in the workplace as it had in place an appropriate policy to prevent sexual harassment which it took reasonable steps to implement and enforce.

The Tribunal concluded however that although the employer had in place a policy for the prevention and reporting of sexual harassment in the workplace and the man was aware of and understood that policy, the action taken in relation to the woman’s complaint was inadequate.  No formal investigation was undertaken, the woman was not asked to provide a statement, witnesses weren’t interviewed at the time, no steps were taken to preserve the CCTV footage and the matter wasn’t escalated to senior management.  The failure to properly investigate the claims formed the basis to find the employer vicariously liable.

Compensation for Sexual Harassment

The woman had suffered from a psychological disorder as a consequence of the harassment which caused her to suffer economic loss.

She experienced difficulty sleeping and eating resulting in the loss of a significant amount of weight, and suffered from nightmares.  University studies she was undertaking began to suffer.  She continued to suffer from fear and anxiety and was diagnosed with an Adjustment Disorder with Depressed and Anxious Mood.  The failure by the employer to undertake a proper, timely and adequate investigation exacerbated her condition.  The woman made a workers compensation claim through which she was compensated for some of her medical expenses and lost earnings.

The Tribunal noted that while this was not the most serious kind of sexual harassment and didn’t occur over a long period of time, nevertheless the woman was entitled to compensation.  The woman was awarded $30,000.00 for general damages including the psychological harm, suffering and hurt feelings.

As the Tribunal observed, “Sexual harassment has many degrees of seriousness.  Anything from a few brief words to rape can meet the definition of sexual harassment under the South Australian Equal Opportunity Act.”  Any person who has been subjected to sexual harassment, in the workplace or elsewhere, can obtain immediate assistance by contacting a specialist discrimination lawyer at Websters Lawyers by calling 8231 1363 or requesting a call through our contact page.

Evans v Ikkos Holdings Pty Ltd and Ythos Holdings Pty Ltd and Ikia Holdings Pty Ltd T/As Foodland and Crugnale [2019] SAET 222 (7 November 2019)





call now

*Conditions Apply


Having such a short time frame I was very impressed with the outcome made by [my solicitor]. Excellent and timely manner


Kurralta Park

Very professional mannerism and overall great outcome was delivered by Websters Lawyers.


West Ryde NSW

Helpful, explained fully, patient, excellent service.



Patient and helpful in explaining the process.



Call Websters Lawyers for a most professional and friendly service. All understanding with [my solicitors] and the reception staff. Thank you so much.



Making my will was effortless on my part, with everything explained clearly. Well done to all.



Great service, professional, explains things clearly, definitely recommend Websters Lawyers.


Upper Hermitage

Patient, professional, good communication about procedures and probable outcomes.



Thank you for all your work over the course of the case. You [both] were always very approachable and I appreciated your understanding and professionalism in all areas.


Christie Downs

All in all my experience was great. Thank you for your time and expertise.


Seacombe Gardens

My matter was dealt with efficiently and was explained in an understandable language. A pleasant experience.



Practical and very helpful. Reasons and explanations given where needed



I stumbled across Websters in the Yellow Pages and I rang, explained my situation and immediately they took my case on. Greatly appreciate their services.



The service from Websters Lawyers was outstanding. [My solicitor] was caring, had patience and was very professional. Wonderful personality.



[My solicitor] made everything so simple to understand. [The receptionist] was wicked too, would recommend them anytime. Level of entire service was outstanding.


Golden Grove


I had dealings with Websters over 20 years ago. They were my first choice when I recently needed legal advice. Both legal and office staff were professional, courteous and accessible at all times. Everything was explained up front in a clear and concise manner. I would not hesitate to recommend their services.



It has truly been a pleasure communicating with you throughout the process. I really appreciate your patient and speedy replies to my questions and requests. You were always able to provide an easily understood response and this helped me deal with the process. Your friendly and positive manner encouraged me to seek your advice.


Battery Hill QLD

[My lawyer's] service was prompt and efficient with all questions explained clearly with all our requests carried out within the laws. Overall service was very satisfactory.


Wynn Vale

[My lawyer] was excellent. 



Excellent service. Professional. Clear advice and instructions. Prompt actions. Overall 10/10!


Ingle Farm

Overall, I was happy with my outcome and my lawyer, would definitely recommend [my lawyer].



[My solicitor] was excellent at helping us through preparing our wills which were particularly challenging as they involved assets in multiple countries. She was professional and knowledgeable and spent time tailoring the wills to our needs.



[My solicitor] was very helpful, respectful and polite. She made sure I understood the process and documentation of our wills.



Professional. Smooth Transaction. 


Largs North

I found the whole experience from Receptionist to Solicitor excellent. They completely put us at our ease.



This was a new experience for us and didn’t have a clue what to do. [Our solicitor] on our first visit put us at ease, explained what will happen, pointed out there was a strong case. [Our solicitor] was genuine in her approach, kept us well informed, explained actions several times with patience and understanding. Overall very happy with the service we received.


Elizabeth Vale

[My lawyer] was very reassuring in her approach to my case. I felt that every possibility in terms of evidence to provide and possible outcomes were explained to me, The result of the case was the best possible outcome I could have expected.

David, Belair


With no previous dealing with the criminal justice system, [our solicitor] gave us excellent advice and guided us through a nightmare to achieve a just and correct outcome. [Our lawyer] was both forthright and compassionate in her handling of our case.

Malcolm, Belair

[My lawyer] explained all the legal terms in language I could understand – she was very easy to talk to.

Cameron, Munno Para

I felt confident knowing my matter was in good hands. Very professional!

Shravan, Christie Downs

Initial phone call was fantastic and the role of an executor was fully explained.

Penny, Henley Beach

The service I received was efficient and promptly finalised. The solicitor clearly explained the details and I was happy with how easy it was.

Dale, Fairview Park

[My lawyer] was exactly the lawyer I needed in a serious matter. The outcome was as predicted which was a fantastic result. I received prompt professional and personal service at all times. Capable and supportive in a very stressful period.

Jason, Munno Para West

I had any of my concerns answered to my satisfaction and understanding.

Valda, Ingle Farm

[My lawyer] is an excellent professional lawyer who assisted in achieving a great positive outcome/result. I sincerely thank you and your great staff for your assistance and guidance throughout my claim. Would highly recommend [my lawyer], staff and Websters Lawyers. Kept fully informed and guided, professionally throughout the matter.

Rena, Northgate

Our work was dealt with very efficiently and speedily. Our lawyer was very professional, at the same time as being approachable. Communication was great.

Christina, Highbury

My experience with Websters Lawyers was far beyond what I expected. From the moment I spoke to [my lawyer] she made me feel very comfortable and eased my stress. In my case I had a court appearance the day before we were scheduled to fly to Spain, Considering my first appointment with her was only 2 weeks before the court hearing, she was able to obtain the police statement and thoroughly work on my case within that limited time frame. She was very knowledgeable, understanding and confident which greatly relieved so much pressure from me and my family. At court, she explained everything thoroughly and advised me of all the possible outcomes. Price, service and result, very highly recommended. Thank you Websters Lawyers.

Rafael, Davoren Park

I have high expectations and they were met. Websters service was swift, courteous, professional and met the agreed budget. I will recommend Websters to my family, friends and colleagues. Thank you.

Peter, Forestville

I would recommend Websters Lawyers, especially for [my lawyer's] dedication and exemplary attitude and advice. She is the epitome of a good lawyer. The service was impeccable.

Pamela, West Lakes

[My lawyer] was very professional and I was made comfortable to understand.

Gregory, Penfield

I was very pleased with the end result and how well [my lawyer] conducted herself.

Sonya, Glanville

Very professional.

Jesse, Morphett Vale

[My lawyer] has been very prompt , reliable and provided a high level of communication.

Peter, Parkside

My experience at Websters was very positive. The stress was taken from me and I could not be happier with the outcome. [My lawyer] at Websters was professional, personable, available and caring. Thank you for making the experience stress free.

Magda, Holden Hill

Found my lawyer upfront and reliable – I would highly recommend Websters Lawyers.

Lee, Evanston Park


Top bunch of solicitors and admin staff. Very friendly and to the point service.

Bradley, Hallett Cove

Websters Lawyers were very professional in their service, I would be happy to recommend them.

Carole, Tea Tree Gully

We would not hesitate in recommending Websters for any legal matter. They are professional and courteous at all times and call back when they say they will.

David and Dianne, Lockleys


I fully recommend Websters Lawyers. This was the 3rd time myself & my family have used Websters Lawyers. In these stressful times we have found them to answer and guide us through the process needed to accomplish the legal requirements in a timely and courteous manner.

Dianne, Lynton

Solid, to the point, no hustle. Highly recommend.

George, Windsor Gardens

Contact us

Adelaide Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8231 1363
F: ( 08 ) 8231 5529

Ridgehaven Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8395 8000
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

Smithfield Office :
T: ( 08 ) 8487 0150
F: ( 08 ) 8395 8222

© Copyright 2017 All Rights Reserved
Website By A to Z Marketing